Google clicks got expensive
In competitive niches the same searcher often costs less on Bing, simply because fewer advertisers bid there. Less volume, but cheaper volume.
Microsoft Advertising · freelance, remote
Less traffic than Google, usually fewer advertisers bidding for it, and an audience that leans towards work computers. For many accounts that trade is worth making, but only if the campaigns are rebuilt for Microsoft, not pasted in from Google and left alone.
In competitive niches the same searcher often costs less on Bing, simply because fewer advertisers bid there. Less volume, but cheaper volume.
Bing is the default on many company laptops, and Microsoft lets you raise bids for people by company, industry, job function and seniority from their LinkedIn profiles. Google search cannot do that.
The same product feed works there, so launching takes setup time, not new creative work. One of the cheapest tests an online store can run.
Is there meaningful Microsoft search volume for your market and niche? In some the honest answer is no, and the check ends there.
Campaigns import from Google in minutes. Then the real work: every imported setting reviewed before the budget starts.
UET tag and conversion goals of its own, otherwise the two platforms claim each other's conversions.
After the first month: cost per lead on both platforms side by side, and budget moved to whichever wins.
One Microsoft Advertising campaign covers Bing and the partner search engines that take their ads from Microsoft, among them Yahoo, AOL and DuckDuckGo. The reach is wider than Bing's own market share suggests.
The same campaigns can also serve ads inside Copilot, Microsoft's AI assistant, next to its answers. You do not need a separate campaign for it, but it is one more reason to keep ad copy and landing pages specific: an AI answer gives the reader context, and a vague ad looks worse next to it.
Microsoft owns LinkedIn, and Microsoft Advertising can use LinkedIn profile data: company, industry, job function and, since mid 2026, job seniority. In search campaigns it works as a bid adjustment on top of keywords. The person still has to search for what you sell, but you can pay more when that person is a procurement manager at a company in your industry.
For B2B services this is often the main reason to run Microsoft at all. The data is not available in every market, so I check it for yours during the fit check.
The import tool copies campaigns in minutes, and carries over settings that do not fit:
I review every imported setting before the budget starts, switch off what would overwrite the clean-up, and read the search terms report after the first two weeks.
Google brings far more volume. Microsoft brings fewer clicks, often at a lower price, from an audience that leans older and more office based. Most accounts do not choose between them: Google stays the main channel, and Microsoft gets the budget where its cost per lead comes out lower.
The decision comes from your data after the first month, not from averages in someone's blog post, mine included.
I look at your market and niche and tell you whether Microsoft is worth your time.
Import, clean-up, tracking and a structure that works on Microsoft's own terms.
Run together with Google Ads for one flat fee, so the budget can move to whichever platform wins.
You pay Microsoft directly for the clicks. That money never passes through me.
Far less than on Google, and it varies a lot by country and niche. That is why the fit check comes first: if the volume is not there, I tell you and we stop.
You can, and many accounts that do it waste money. Imported locations, schedules and bids rarely suit Microsoft as they are, and scheduled re-imports undo any fixes. Import is the start of the work, not the end.
Yes, with the same product feed you use in Google Merchant Center. For online stores that makes Microsoft one of the cheapest channels to test.
Not when I already run your Google Ads: both platforms are covered by one flat fee. On its own, Microsoft Ads management starts from the same $300 a month.
Yes. Both take their search ads from Microsoft's network, so the same campaign reaches them along with Bing.
They can. Microsoft serves ads from regular campaigns inside Copilot answers, without a separate campaign type. You see those placements in the same reports.
You can raise or lower bids by company, industry, job function and seniority from LinkedIn profiles. In search it works on top of keywords, so the person still has to search for what you sell.
Not by default. I judge it by cost per lead and, where you share it, lead quality in your own data after the first month, then move budget to whichever platform wins.
Tell me what you sell and where you advertise now. I look at the account with read-only access, change nothing, and walk you through what I found on a 20-minute call. The list of fixes stays with you, even if we never work together.